lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 10:13:11 -0700
From: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] hwmon: (coretemp) Extend the bitmask to read temperature to 0xff

The Intel Software Development manual defines the temperature digital
readout as the bits [22:16] of the IA32_[PACKAGE]_THERM_STATUS registers.
Bit 23 is specified as reserved.

In recent processors, however, the temperature digital readout uses bits
[23:16]. In those processors, using the bitmask 0x7f would lead to
incorrect readings if the temperature deviates from TjMax by more than
127 degrees Celsius.

Although not guaranteed, bit 23 is likely to be 0 in processors from a few
generations ago. The temperature reading would still be correct in those
processors when using a 0xff bitmask.

Model-specific provisions can be made for older processors in which bit 23
is not 0 should the need arise.

Signed-off-by: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>
---
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # v6.7+
---
Changes since v1:
 * Corrected wrong sentence in commit message. (Rui)
 * Removed dependency on INTEL_TCC. (Guenter)
---
 drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
index 616bd1a5b864..1b9203b20d70 100644
--- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
+++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c
@@ -411,7 +411,7 @@ static ssize_t show_temp(struct device *dev,
 		 * Return it instead of reporting an error which doesn't
 		 * really help at all.
 		 */
-		tdata->temp = tjmax - ((eax >> 16) & 0x7f) * 1000;
+		tdata->temp = tjmax - ((eax >> 16) & 0xff) * 1000;
 		tdata->last_updated = jiffies;
 	}
 
-- 
2.34.1


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ