linux-kernel - [PATCH 06/10] KVM: x86: Refactor kvm_get_feature_msr() to avoid struct kvm_msr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240425181422.3250947-7-seanjc@google.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:14:18 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>, Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/10] KVM: x86: Refactor kvm_get_feature_msr() to avoid
 struct kvm_msr_entry

Refactor kvm_get_feature_msr() to take the components of kvm_msr_entry as
separate parameters, along with a vCPU pointer, i.e. to give it the same
prototype as kvm_{g,s}et_msr_ignored_check().  This will allow using a
common inner helper for handling accesses to "regular" and feature MSRs.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 29 +++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
index 8f58181f2b6d..c0727df18e92 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c
@@ -1682,39 +1682,38 @@ static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void)
 	return data;
 }
 
-static int kvm_get_feature_msr(struct kvm_msr_entry *msr)
+static int kvm_get_feature_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u32 index, u64 *data,
+			       bool host_initiated)
 {
-	switch (msr->index) {
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(!host_initiated);
+
+	switch (index) {
 	case MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES:
-		msr->data = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
+		*data = kvm_get_arch_capabilities();
 		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_PERF_CAPABILITIES:
-		msr->data = kvm_caps.supported_perf_cap;
+		*data = kvm_caps.supported_perf_cap;
 		break;
 	case MSR_IA32_UCODE_REV:
-		rdmsrl_safe(msr->index, &msr->data);
+		rdmsrl_safe(index, data);
 		break;
 	default:
-		return static_call(kvm_x86_get_feature_msr)(msr->index, &msr->data);
+		return static_call(kvm_x86_get_feature_msr)(index, data);
 	}
 	return 0;
 }
 
 static int do_get_feature_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned index, u64 *data)
 {
-	struct kvm_msr_entry msr;
 	int r;
 
 	/* Unconditionally clear the output for simplicity */
-	msr.data = 0;
-	msr.index = index;
-	r = kvm_get_feature_msr(&msr);
+	*data = 0;
+	r = kvm_get_feature_msr(vcpu, index, data, true);
 
 	if (r == KVM_MSR_RET_UNSUPPORTED && kvm_msr_ignored_check(index, 0, false))
 		r = 0;
 
-	*data = msr.data;
-
 	return r;
 }
 
@@ -7363,11 +7362,9 @@ int kvm_arch_vm_ioctl(struct file *filp, unsigned int ioctl, unsigned long arg)
 
 static void kvm_probe_feature_msr(u32 msr_index)
 {
-	struct kvm_msr_entry msr = {
-		.index = msr_index,
-	};
+	u64 data;
 
-	if (kvm_get_feature_msr(&msr))
+	if (kvm_get_feature_msr(NULL, msr_index, &data, true))
 		return;
 
 	msr_based_features[num_msr_based_features++] = msr_index;
-- 
2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog