[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<SJ1PR21MB3457C82002C9F8F1E3F04EC7CE172@SJ1PR21MB3457.namprd21.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:29:45 +0000
From: Long Li <longli@...rosoft.com>
To: Konstantin Taranov <kotaranov@...rosoft.com>, Konstantin Taranov
<kotaranov@...ux.microsoft.com>, "sharmaajay@...rosoft.com"
<sharmaajay@...rosoft.com>, "jgg@...pe.ca" <jgg@...pe.ca>, "leon@...nel.org"
<leon@...nel.org>
CC: "linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org" <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH rdma-next 4/6] RDMA/mana_ib: introduce a helper to remove
cq callbacks
> > > +void mana_ib_remove_cq_cb(struct mana_ib_dev *mdev, struct
> > > mana_ib_cq
> > > +*cq) {
> > > + struct gdma_context *gc = mdev_to_gc(mdev);
> > > +
> > > + if (cq->queue.id >= gc->max_num_cqs)
> > > + return;
> > > +
> > > + kfree(gc->cq_table[cq->queue.id]);
> > > + gc->cq_table[cq->queue.id] = NULL;
> >
> > Why the check for (cq->queue.id != INVALID_QUEUE_ID) is removed?
>
> As max_num_cqs is always less than INVALID_QUEUE_ID, it is included in the "if".
> I can add " || cq->queue.id == INVALID_QUEUE_ID " to the condition if you want.
Okay, can you add a comment before if (cq->queue.id >= gc->max_num_cqs) saying it also works with INVALID_QUEUE_ID?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists