[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240425133121.efd1f9da094be454a6366cf2@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:31:21 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
Cc: elver@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com, ojeda@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
syzbot+355c5bb8c1445c871ee8@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmsan: compiler_types: declare __no_sanitize_or_inline
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 11:28:59 +0200 Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com> wrote:
> It turned out that KMSAN instruments READ_ONCE_NOCHECK(), resulting in
> false positive reports, because __no_sanitize_or_inline enforced inlining.
>
> Properly declare __no_sanitize_or_inline under __SANITIZE_MEMORY__,
> so that it does not inline the annotated function.
>
> Reported-by: syzbot+355c5bb8c1445c871ee8@...kaller.appspotmail.com
I'll add
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/000000000000826ac1061675b0e3@google.com
And I think a cc:stable is justifiable. A Fixes: target would be nice?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists