[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <21a1152d-2005-4883-bdd1-396b561aaea1@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:39:04 -0700
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>
To: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@...ux.intel.com>,
<linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, Babu Moger
<babu.moger@....com>, Maciej Wieczór-Retman
<maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com>
CC: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/16] selftests/resctrl: Add ->init() callback into
resctrl_val_param
Hi Ilpo,
On 4/8/2024 9:32 AM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> The struct resctrl_val_param is there to customize behavior inside
> resctrl_val() which is currently not used to full extent and there are
> number of strcmp()s for test name in resctrl_val done by resctrl_val().
>
> Create ->init() hook into the struct resctrl_val_param to cleanly
> do per test initialization.
>
> Remove also unused branches to setup paths and the related #defines
> for CMT test.
All these code being moved have a similar pattern to earlier code that
was deleted. It seems to me as though the CMT may also unnecessarily
create a monitor group and have the same opportunity to remove
some of the code being moved around here.
It is starting to look like resctrl_val_param->mongrp is not necessary.
Reinette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists