[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c054ea77-25a5-410c-bb2c-08fd23df9a92@linux.alibaba.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 15:04:56 +0800
From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com>
To: Lance Yang <ioworker0@...il.com>
Cc: 21cnbao@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, david@...hat.com,
hughd@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
ryan.roberts@....com, shy828301@...il.com, wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com,
willy@...radead.org, ying.huang@...el.com, ziy@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/5] mm: memory: extend finish_fault() to support
large folio
On 2024/4/23 16:39, Lance Yang wrote:
> Hey Baolin,
>
> [...]
> @@ -4727,9 +4725,11 @@ vm_fault_t finish_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
> [...]
>
> The mm counters have been moved from updating out of set_pte_range(), so we
> we may need to rebase against Kefeng's patch[1].
Yes, I did not rebase on the new mm-unstable branch, and I will do so
for the next formal patch set. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists