[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <77b837b8-600a-4ad9-b2f9-ee24450e8c5f@blaize.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 08:18:56 +0100
From: Nikolaos Pasaloukos <nikolaos.pasaloukos@...ize.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: James Cowgill <james.cowgill@...ize.com>,
Matt Redfearn <matthew.redfearn@...ize.com>,
Neil Jones <neil.jones@...ize.com>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Stephen Boyd
<sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"linux-clk@...r.kernel.org" <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] dt-bindings: clock: Add binding constants for
BLZP1600
On 25/04/2024 07:56, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 24/04/2024 18:14, Nikolaos Pasaloukos wrote:
>>> No, they cannot be invalid. IDs start from 0 and are incremented by one.
>>> If you have holes, it is not a binding.
>>>
>>> Drop the header or use it properly, so as virtual IDs.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Krzysztof
>>>
>> My intention was to avoid using magic numbers on the DeviceTree. That's why I added them here.
>> Also, we have some custom drivers which we plan to upload and their schemas need those files.
>> The alternative would be to use magic numbers for our clocks and resets.
>>
>> In the commit message and on the header file I have mentioned that these are numbers matching
>> the hardware specification (1 to 1) of the chip not just enums.
>> Some IDs are invalid because of a hardware gap, some others are invalid because the SCMI
>> service will return an error that the number is invalid.
>>
>> Is there another way to prevent the magic numbers in the schemas and device-tree.
>>
>> Thank you very much for your fast and detailed review.
> Bindings describe the interface between DTS and drivers (OS or some sort
> of other software). The purpose of binding headers is to document the
> constants which are used by both, because they are part of that
> interface. Therefore constants are pure abstraction.
>
> Let me rephrase the question: Why you do not have headers for interrupt
> numbers? All addresses? GPIO pin numbers?
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Thank you very much for your feedback Krzysztof, I'll prepare a v3 with proper
threading this time, removing the dt-bindings for the clock & reset.
Best regards,
Niko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists