[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<TYWPR01MB10773C220D1E6C1AFD1BD2F8890172@TYWPR01MB10773.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 08:00:44 +0000
From: Norihiko Hama <norihiko.hama@...salpine.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
CC: "gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>, "linux-doc@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-usb@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, "usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net"
<usb-storage@...ts.one-eyed-alien.net>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4] usb-storage: Optimize scan delay more precisely
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:51:57AM -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 10:31:34AM +0900, Norihiko Hama wrote:
> > > + Example:
> > > + delay_use=2.567
> >
> > This could go on the previous line.
> >
> > Example: delay_use = 2.567
>
> Oops, this shouldn't have the extra spaces around the '=' sign.
>
> Example: delay_use=2.567
>
Thank you for reviewing patch.
I'll fix it based on your proposal (also on your previous reply) and submit it as v5.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists