linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Remove support for legacy UFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2024 21:57:01 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Avri Altman <avri.altman@....com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>,
        linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/1] Remove support for legacy UFS

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 21:37:18 +0300, Avri Altman wrote:

> UFS1.0 and UFS1.1, published in the early 2010s, were more of a proof of
> concept rather than a mature functional spec. Toshiba was the only
> device manufacturer with the most accomplished phy team to come up with
> a small UFS1.0 device. Alas, there were no commercial platforms it can
> be paired with. Even UFS2.0 that was published in 2013, didn't really
> make it to the market: too moot to take effect. It's not until UFS2.1
> that was published in 2016, were a myriad of devices and platforms
> flooded the market. Designated to mobile devices, dictates a rapid short
> lives for those platforms. Hence, we can safely remove those pre-UFS2.0
> pieces of code.
> 
> [...]

Applied to 6.10/scsi-queue, thanks!

[1/1] scsi: ufs: Remove support for old UFSHCI versions
      https://git.kernel.org/mkp/scsi/c/a33a502d50fd

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering