[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <57698077-d09d-4ada-90a3-69ddd10bbb55@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 13:09:17 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Nikolaos Pasaloukos <nikolaos.pasaloukos@...ize.com>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org" <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
"conor+dt@...nel.org" <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
"catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
"will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>, "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
"olof@...om.net" <olof@...om.net>, Neil Jones <neil.jones@...ize.com>,
Matt Redfearn <matthew.redfearn@...ize.com>,
James Cowgill <james.cowgill@...ize.com>,
"heiko.stuebner@...rry.de" <heiko.stuebner@...rry.de>,
"shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"macromorgan@...mail.com" <macromorgan@...mail.com>,
"sre@...nel.org" <sre@...nel.org>,
"hvilleneuve@...onoff.com" <hvilleneuve@...onoff.com>,
"andre.przywara@....com" <andre.przywara@....com>,
"rafal@...ecki.pl" <rafal@...ecki.pl>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"andersson@...nel.org" <andersson@...nel.org>,
"konrad.dybcio@...aro.org" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"geert+renesas@...der.be" <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
"neil.armstrong@...aro.org" <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"nfraprado@...labora.com" <nfraprado@...labora.com>,
"u-kumar1@...com" <u-kumar1@...com>
Cc: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/5] arm64: Add initial support for Blaize BLZP1600 CB2
On 25/04/2024 12:41, Nikolaos Pasaloukos wrote:
>>> +
>>> + soc {
>>
>> This does not cause dtbs_check W=1 warnings? Surprising a bit... This
>> should cause big fat warning, so I have doubts patchset was tested.
>>
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>>
>
> No it doesn't cause any warnings. I did:
> make arch=arm64 dt_binding_check
> make arch=arm64 dtbs_check W=1
> I don't get any warnings. Could you please let me know what kind of
> warning I should get? Am I doing something wrong and I don't get
> the warning?
I was expecting one for missing soc unit address, but you are right -
your ranges are empty, so "soc" is ok. I keep forgetting that
distinction. Looks fine then.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists