linux-kernel - [PATCH linux-next] ksm: add ksm involvement information for each process

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202404252049158858OT9IpNshMmQC1itDY1B1@zte.com.cn>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 20:49:15 +0800 (CST)
From: <xu.xin16@....com.cn>
To: <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <shr@...kernel.io>, <david@...hat.com>, <xu.xin16@....com.cn>
Subject: [PATCH linux-next] ksm: add ksm involvement information for each process

From: xu xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>

In /proc/<pid>/ksm_stat, Add two extra ksm involvement items including
MMF_VM_MERGEABLE and MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY. It helps administrators to
better know the system's KSM behavior at process level.

MMF_VM_MERGEABLE: yes/no
	whether a process'mm is added by madvise() into the candidate list
	of KSM or not.
MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY: yes/no
	whether a process'mm is added by prctl at process level into the
candidate list of KSM or not.

Signed-off-by: xu xin <xu.xin16@....com.cn>
---
 fs/proc/base.c | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
index 18550c071d71..421594b8510c 100644
--- a/fs/proc/base.c
+++ b/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -3217,6 +3217,10 @@ static int proc_pid_ksm_stat(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
 		seq_printf(m, "ksm_zero_pages %lu\n", mm->ksm_zero_pages);
 		seq_printf(m, "ksm_merging_pages %lu\n", mm->ksm_merging_pages);
 		seq_printf(m, "ksm_process_profit %ld\n", ksm_process_profit(mm));
+		seq_printf(m, "MMF_VM_MERGEABLE: %s\n",
+				test_bit(MMF_VM_MERGEABLE, &mm->flags) ? "yes" : "no");
+		seq_printf(m, "MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY: %s\n",
+				test_bit(MMF_VM_MERGE_ANY, &mm->flags) ? "yes" : "no");
 		mmput(mm);
 	}

-- 
2.15.2