[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZipiPZia5iY_UsHQ@gpd>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 16:01:33 +0200
From: Andrea Righi <andrea.righi@...onical.com>
To: Jiri Olsa <olsajiri@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Eduard Zingerman <eddyz87@...il.com>,
Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Add ring_buffer__consume_n test.
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 02:23:30PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 08:19:04AM +0200, Andrea Righi wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 10:11:33PM +0200, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> > ...
> > > > static struct test_ringbuf_map_key_lskel *skel_map_key;
> > > > +static struct test_ringbuf_n_lskel *skel_n;
> > >
> > > seems like there's no need for this to be static variable
> >
> > Can you elaborate more? I think we want these pointers to be static to
> > limit the scope to this file, no?
>
> I meant to move it directly inside ringbuf_n_subtest function,
> I don't see reason why it's defined outside of that function
Oh I see! Yeah, that makes sense, I'll send a v3 soon.
Thanks,
-Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists