[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240425084537.6e406d86@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 08:45:37 -0700
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>, Steve French
<sfrench@...ba.org>, Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, "David S.
Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Paolo
Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, netfs@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] Fix a potential infinite loop in
extract_user_to_sg()
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 09:39:32 +0100 David Howells wrote:
> Fix extract_user_to_sg() so that it will break out of the loop if
> iov_iter_extract_pages() returns 0 rather than looping around forever.
Is "goto fail" the right way to break out here?
My intuition would be "break".
On a quick read it seems like res = 0 may occur if we run out of
iterator, is passing maxsize > iter->count illegal?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists