[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240426-venue-maximum-f78ac451b146@spud>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:25:20 +0100
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>,
Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 09/17] riscv: drivers: Convert xandespmu to use the
vendor extension framework
On Sat, Apr 20, 2024 at 06:04:41PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> Migrate xandespmu out of riscv_isa_ext and into a new Andes-specific
> vendor namespace.
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> index 8cbe6e5f9c39..84760ce61e03 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/riscv_pmu_sbi.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
> #include <asm/errata_list.h>
> #include <asm/sbi.h>
> #include <asm/cpufeature.h>
> +#include <asm/vendorid_list.h>
> +#include <asm/vendor_extensions/andes.h>
>
> #define ALT_SBI_PMU_OVERFLOW(__ovl) \
> asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2( \
> @@ -32,7 +34,7 @@ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2( \
> THEAD_VENDOR_ID, ERRATA_THEAD_PMU, \
> CONFIG_ERRATA_THEAD_PMU, \
> "csrr %0, " __stringify(ANDES_CSR_SCOUNTEROF), \
> - 0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_XANDESPMU, \
> + ANDES_VENDOR_ID, RISCV_ISA_VENDOR_EXT_XANDESPMU, \
> CONFIG_ANDES_CUSTOM_PMU) \
> : "=r" (__ovl) : \
> : "memory")
> @@ -41,7 +43,7 @@ asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE_2( \
> asm volatile(ALTERNATIVE( \
> "csrc " __stringify(CSR_IP) ", %0\n\t", \
> "csrc " __stringify(ANDES_CSR_SLIP) ", %0\n\t", \
> - 0, RISCV_ISA_EXT_XANDESPMU, \
> + ANDES_VENDOR_ID, RISCV_ISA_VENDOR_EXT_XANDESPMU, \
> CONFIG_ANDES_CUSTOM_PMU) \
> : : "r"(__irq_mask) \
> : "memory")
> @@ -837,7 +839,7 @@ static int pmu_sbi_setup_irqs(struct riscv_pmu *pmu, struct platform_device *pde
> riscv_cached_mimpid(0) == 0) {
> riscv_pmu_irq_num = THEAD_C9XX_RV_IRQ_PMU;
> riscv_pmu_use_irq = true;
> - } else if (riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, XANDESPMU) &&
> + } else if (riscv_isa_vendor_extension_available(-1, XANDESPMU) &&
What's the rationale for this not using riscv_has_extension_unlikely()?
Happens once in probe so don't bother? I forget if we discussed it when
the code was added, but it would save us from the NULL/-1 syntax,
neither of which I think is a good interface.
Also, I'd prob drop the "drivers" from $subject.
I'll come back and look at the rest of this Monday, it's a sunny Friday
here and I've still got my devicetree patch queue to clear..
Cheers,
Conor.
> IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ANDES_CUSTOM_PMU)) {
> riscv_pmu_irq_num = ANDES_SLI_CAUSE_BASE + ANDES_RV_IRQ_PMOVI;
> riscv_pmu_use_irq = true;
>
> --
> 2.44.0
>
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists