linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Input: edt-ft5x06

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20240426205302.4acbdb11@aktux>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 20:53:02 +0200
From: Andreas Kemnade <andreas@...nade.info>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Felix Kaechele <felix@...chele.ca>, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
 robh+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, conor+dt@...nel.org,
 o.rempel@...gutronix.de, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
 hdegoede@...hat.com, ye.xingchen@....com.cn, p.puschmann@...onex.com,
 linux-input@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, caleb.connolly@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] Input: edt-ft5x06 - add ft5426

Hi,

On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:51:59 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:

> > I think focaltech,ft5406 is better because it is consistent with other drivers/
> > bindings. We do not specify the display it is used on on other touchscreen
> > bindings. We do not specify the actual LEDs behind a LED interface chip.
> > And often the chip name is more easily to find out than the name of a
> > display.  
> 
> I'm _not_ a DT person, you should clarify this with them. I just
> pointed out the possible mistake (from Linux / DT perspective), and
> not hardware / business related one. If they are fine with focaltech
> prefix, then it's fine to me as well!

as 1/2 is Acked-by DT, I think the compatible is fine, so I will probably
just send a v3 with a sorted 2/2.

Regards,
Andreas