linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v14 21/22] crypto: ccp: Add the SNP_{PAUSE,RESUME}

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 12:57:08 -0700
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Michael Roth <michael.roth@....com>
Cc: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, jroedel@...e.de, 
	thomas.lendacky@....com, hpa@...or.com, ardb@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com, 
	vkuznets@...hat.com, jmattson@...gle.com, luto@...nel.org, 
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, slp@...hat.com, pgonda@...gle.com, 
	peterz@...radead.org, srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com, 
	rientjes@...gle.com, dovmurik@...ux.ibm.com, tobin@....com, bp@...en8.de, 
	vbabka@...e.cz, kirill@...temov.name, ak@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com, 
	sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com, alpergun@...gle.com, 
	jarkko@...nel.org, ashish.kalra@....com, nikunj.dadhania@....com, 
	pankaj.gupta@....com, liam.merwick@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 21/22] crypto: ccp: Add the SNP_{PAUSE,RESUME}_ATTESTATION
 commands

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024, Michael Roth wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 05:15:40PM -0700, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 21, 2024, Michael Roth wrote:
> > > These commands can be used to pause servicing of guest attestation
> > > requests. This useful when updating the reported TCB or signing key with
> > > commands such as SNP_SET_CONFIG/SNP_COMMIT/SNP_VLEK_LOAD, since they may
> > > in turn require updates to userspace-supplied certificates, and if an
> > > attestation request happens to be in-flight at the time those updates
> > > are occurring there is potential for a guest to receive a certificate
> > > blob that is out of sync with the effective signing key for the
> > > attestation report.
> > > 
> > > These interfaces also provide some versatility with how similar
> > > firmware/certificate update activities can be handled in the future.
> > 
> > Wait, IIUC, this is using the kernel to get two userspace components to not
> > stomp over each other.   Why is this the kernel's problem to solve?
> 
> It's not that they are stepping on each other, but that kernel and
> userspace need to coordinate on updating 2 components whose updates need
> to be atomic from a guest perspective. Take an update to VLEK key for
> instance:
> 
>  1) management gets a new VLEK endorsement key from KDS along with

What is "management"?  I assume its some userspace daemon?

>     associated certificate chain
>  2) management uses SNP_VLEK_LOAD to update key
>  3) management updates the certs at the path VMM will grab them
>     from when the EXT_GUEST_REQUEST userspace exit is issued
> 
> If an attestation request comes in after 2), but before 3), then the
> guest sees an attestation report signed with the new key, but still
> gets the old certificate.
> 
> If you reverse the ordering:
> 
>  1) management gets a new VLEK endorsement key from KDS along with
>     associated certificate chain
>  2) management updates the certs at the path VMM will grab them
>     from when the EXT_GUEST_REQUEST userspace exit is issued
>  3) management uses SNP_VLEK_LOAD to update key
> 
> then an attestation request between 2) and 3) will result in the guest
> getting the new cert, but getting an attestation report signed with an old
> endorsement key.
> 
> Providing a way to pause guest attestation requests prior to 2), and
> resume after 3), provides a straightforward way to make those updates
> atomic to the guest.

Assuming "management" is a userspace component, I still don't see why this
requires kernel involvement.  "management" can tell VMMs to pause attestation
without having to bounce through the kernel.  It doesn't even require a push
model, e.g. wrap/redirect the certs with a file that has a "pause" flag and a
sequence counter.