[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240426160115.7797a43a@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:01:15 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>, Christoph Hellwig
<hch@....de>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing
List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Next Mailing List
<linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the scsi-mkp tree with the block
tree
Hi all,
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 14:55:54 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi-mkp tree got conflicts in:
>
> block/blk-settings.c
> include/linux/blkdev.h
>
> between commit:
>
> e4eb37cc0f3e ("block: Remove elevator required features")
>
> from the block tree and commit:
>
> ec84ca4025c0 ("scsi: block: Remove now unused queue limits helpers")
>
> from the scsi-mkp tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc block/blk-settings.c
> index 8e1d7ed52fef,292aadf8d807..000000000000
> --- a/block/blk-settings.c
> +++ b/block/blk-settings.c
> @@@ -1048,28 -822,22 +825,6 @@@ void blk_queue_write_cache(struct reque
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_write_cache);
>
> --/**
> - * blk_queue_can_use_dma_map_merging - configure queue for merging segments.
> - * @q: the request queue for the device
> - * @dev: the device pointer for dma
> - * blk_queue_required_elevator_features - Set a queue required elevator features
> - * @q: the request queue for the target device
> - * @features: Required elevator features OR'ed together
> -- *
> - * Tell the block layer about merging the segments by dma map of @q.
> - * Tell the block layer that for the device controlled through @q, only the
> - * only elevators that can be used are those that implement at least the set of
> - * features specified by @features.
> -- */
> - bool blk_queue_can_use_dma_map_merging(struct request_queue *q,
> - struct device *dev)
> -void blk_queue_required_elevator_features(struct request_queue *q,
> - unsigned int features)
> --{
> - unsigned long boundary = dma_get_merge_boundary(dev);
> -
> - if (!boundary)
> - return false;
> -
> - /* No need to update max_segment_size. see blk_queue_virt_boundary() */
> - blk_queue_virt_boundary(q, boundary);
> -
> - return true;
> - q->required_elevator_features = features;
> --}
> - EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_can_use_dma_map_merging);
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(blk_queue_required_elevator_features);
> --
> /**
> * disk_set_zoned - inidicate a zoned device
> * @disk: gendisk to configure
> diff --cc include/linux/blkdev.h
> index 2c535af79529,e3c7082efa39..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/blkdev.h
> +++ b/include/linux/blkdev.h
> @@@ -924,9 -942,15 +926,6 @@@ disk_alloc_independent_access_ranges(st
> void disk_set_independent_access_ranges(struct gendisk *disk,
> struct blk_independent_access_ranges *iars);
>
> - extern bool blk_queue_can_use_dma_map_merging(struct request_queue *q,
> - struct device *dev);
> -/*
> - * Elevator features for blk_queue_required_elevator_features:
> - */
> -/* Supports zoned block devices sequential write constraint */
> -#define ELEVATOR_F_ZBD_SEQ_WRITE (1U << 0)
> -
> -extern void blk_queue_required_elevator_features(struct request_queue *q,
> - unsigned int features);
> --
> bool __must_check blk_get_queue(struct request_queue *);
> extern void blk_put_queue(struct request_queue *);
>
This is now a conflict between the scsi tree and the block tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists