[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZitEd_CzSgqy2Kd0@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Apr 2024 23:06:47 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>,
Mike Snitzer <msnitzer@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@...nel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Guangwu Zhang <guazhang@...hat.com>, dm-devel@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] completion: move blk_wait_io to
kernel/sched/completion.c
On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 12:59:56PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> A bit like TASK_NOLOAD (which is used to make TASK_IDLE work), but
> different I suppose.
>
> TASK_NOHUNG would be trivial to add ofc. But is it worth it?
Yes. And it would allow us to kill the horrible existing block hack.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists