[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANn89i+n76MEoQPbj8oxMMEw5N6T8KAP4Xp2YsUYb32fUzAJNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 09:32:11 +0200
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
To: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...nel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 net-next v3 6/6] net: add heuristic for enabling TCP
fraglist GRO
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 8:51 AM Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name> wrote:
>
> When forwarding TCP after GRO, software segmentation is very expensive,
> especially when the checksum needs to be recalculated.
> One case where that's currently unavoidable is when routing packets over
> PPPoE. Performance improves significantly when using fraglist GRO
> implemented in the same way as for UDP.
>
> When NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST is enabled, perform a lookup for an established
> socket in the same netns as the receiving device. While this may not
> cover all relevant use cases in multi-netns configurations, it should be
> good enough for most configurations that need this.
>
> Here's a measurement of running 2 TCP streams through a MediaTek MT7622
> device (2-core Cortex-A53), which runs NAT with flow offload enabled from
> one ethernet port to PPPoE on another ethernet port + cake qdisc set to
> 1Gbps.
>
> rx-gro-list off: 630 Mbit/s, CPU 35% idle
> rx-gro-list on: 770 Mbit/s, CPU 40% idle
>
> Signe-off-by: Felix Fietkau <nbd@....name>
> ---
> net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 63 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
> index ee5403760775..2ae83f4394dc 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_offload.c
> @@ -406,6 +406,34 @@ void tcp_gro_complete(struct sk_buff *skb)
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(tcp_gro_complete);
>
> +static void tcp4_check_fraglist_gro(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct tcphdr *th)
> +{
> + const struct iphdr *iph = skb_gro_network_header(skb);
> + struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
Could you defer the initializations of iph and net after the
NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST check ?
dev_net() has an implicit READ_ONCE() ...
> + struct sk_buff *p;
> + struct sock *sk;
> + int iif, sdif;
> +
> + if (!(skb->dev->features & NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST))
> + return;
> +
> + p = tcp_gro_lookup(head, th);
> + if (p) {
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_flist = NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->is_flist;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + inet_get_iif_sdif(skb, &iif, &sdif);
> + sk = __inet_lookup_established(net, net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo,
> + iph->saddr, th->source,
> + iph->daddr, ntohs(th->dest),
> + iif, sdif);
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_flist = !sk;
> + if (sk)
> + sock_put(sk);
> +}
> +
> INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE
> struct sk_buff *tcp4_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> @@ -421,6 +449,8 @@ struct sk_buff *tcp4_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (!th)
> goto flush;
>
> + tcp4_check_fraglist_gro(head, skb, th);
> +
> return tcp_gro_receive(head, skb, th);
>
> flush:
> diff --git a/net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c b/net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c
> index c01ace2e9ff0..1ab45cca3936 100644
> --- a/net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c
> +++ b/net/ipv6/tcpv6_offload.c
> @@ -7,12 +7,43 @@
> */
> #include <linux/indirect_call_wrapper.h>
> #include <linux/skbuff.h>
> +#include <net/inet6_hashtables.h>
> #include <net/gro.h>
> #include <net/protocol.h>
> #include <net/tcp.h>
> #include <net/ip6_checksum.h>
> #include "ip6_offload.h"
>
> +static void tcp6_check_fraglist_gro(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb,
> + struct tcphdr *th)
> +{
> +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
> + const struct ipv6hdr *hdr = skb_gro_network_header(skb);
> + struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev);
Same remark here.
> + struct sk_buff *p;
> + struct sock *sk;
> + int iif, sdif;
> +
> + if (!(skb->dev->features & NETIF_F_GRO_FRAGLIST))
> + return;
> +
> + p = tcp_gro_lookup(head, th);
> + if (p) {
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_flist = NAPI_GRO_CB(p)->is_flist;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + inet6_get_iif_sdif(skb, &iif, &sdif);
> + sk = __inet6_lookup_established(net, net->ipv4.tcp_death_row.hashinfo,
> + &hdr->saddr, th->source,
> + &hdr->daddr, ntohs(th->dest),
> + iif, sdif);
> + NAPI_GRO_CB(skb)->is_flist = !sk;
> + if (sk)
> + sock_put(sk);
> +#endif /* IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6) */
> +}
> +
> INDIRECT_CALLABLE_SCOPE
> struct sk_buff *tcp6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
> {
> @@ -28,6 +59,8 @@ struct sk_buff *tcp6_gro_receive(struct list_head *head, struct sk_buff *skb)
> if (!th)
> goto flush;
>
> + tcp6_check_fraglist_gro(head, skb, th);
> +
> return tcp_gro_receive(head, skb, th);
>
> flush:
> --
> 2.44.0
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists