linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 01/14] ASoC: SOF: debug: Constify local snd_sof_dsp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 10:00:14 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>,
 Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
 Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@...ux.intel.com>,
 Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
 Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
 Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@....com>,
 Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@...ux.intel.com>, Jaroslav Kysela
 <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
 Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
 Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
 Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, Matthias Brugger
 <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
 AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
 sound-open-firmware@...a-project.org, linux-sound@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, imx@...ts.linux.dev,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/14] ASoC: SOF: debug: Constify local snd_sof_dsp_ops

On 26/04/2024 09:58, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 26/04/2024 04:09, Mark Brown wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 08:47:26PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Constify the pointer to 'struct snd_sof_dsp_ops' to annotate that
>>> functioon does not modify pointed data.
>>
>> This doesn't apply against current code, please check and resend.
> 
> Maybe I am basing on wrong tree. I applied now on for-next of your
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git/ and
> b4 did not complain - no hunk rejects.
> 
> I will resend based on that tree, but I expect same result. Let me know
> if I should use different tree.

Never mind, my bad, the base commit was not public, but a commit from my
development tree, so b4 properly figured out any conflicts transparently
in my case.

Best regards,
Krzysztof