[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZitjoLvggYB7vR0O@nuoska>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:19:44 +0300
From: Mikko Rapeli <mikko.rapeli@...aro.org>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: Lennart Poettering <mzxreary@...inter.de>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Ilias Apalodimas <ilias.apalodimas@...aro.org>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi: expose TPM event log to userspace via sysfs
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 10:40:20AM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Fri Apr 26, 2024 at 10:35 AM EEST, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > On Thu Apr 25, 2024 at 5:01 PM EEST, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> > > On Thu Apr 25, 2024 at 12:58 PM EEST, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > > General purpose distros typically don't build all TPM drivers into the
> > > > kernel, but ship some in the initrd instead. Then, udev is responsible
> > > > for iterating all buses/devices and auto-loading the necessary
> > > > drivers. Each loaded bus driver might make more devices available for
> > >
> > > I've had since day 0 that I've worked with TPM driver (i.e. since 2013
> >
> > - had the opinion (typo)
>
> Tbh, I have zero idea what this discussion is about anyway because the
> original thread *was not* CC'd to linux-integrity and I'm not subscribed
> to linux-efi. So next time put all the relevant mailing lists. I.e.
> definitive NAK for this patch.
Sorry for not including linux-integrity. I added maintainers and lists
proposed by scripts/get_maintainers.pl for the change which did not touch
drivers/char/tpm/ though TPM event log APIs are clearly there.
The full thread starts from here:
https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240422112711.362779-1-mikko.rapeli@linaro.org/T/#u
Cheers,
-Mikko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists