[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0a96abc4-8205-447d-9e7d-03397de5ada8@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 19:25:36 +1000
From: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev, x86@...nel.org, Russell King
<linux@...linux.org.uk>, "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>, James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, linuxarm@...wei.com,
justin.he@....com, jianyong.wu@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/16] ACPI: scan: switch to flags for
acpi_scan_check_and_detach()
On 4/18/24 23:54, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> Precursor patch adds the ability to pass a uintptr_t of flags into
> acpi_scan_check_and detach() so that additional flags can be
> added to indicate whether to defer portions of the eject flow.
> The new flag follows in the next patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
>
> ---
> v7: No change
> v6: Based on internal feedback switch to less invasive change
> to using flags rather than a struct.
> ---
> drivers/acpi/scan.c | 17 ++++++++++++-----
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists