linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] thermal/debugfs: Prevent use-after-free from occurring after cdev removal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJZ5v0jBhwL2w7MfBj4g7hV8VqrJYS-Pwr2rgYyWD4qfkQ5F0g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 11:54:45 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
To: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, 
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, 
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] thermal/debugfs: Prevent use-after-free from
 occurring after cdev removal

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:35 AM Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 4/26/24 10:28, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > Since thermal_debug_cdev_remove() does not run under cdev->lock, it can
> > run in parallel with thermal_debug_cdev_state_update() and it may free
> > the struct thermal_debugfs object used by the latter after it has been
> > checked against NULL.
> >
> > If that happens, thermal_debug_cdev_state_update() will access memory
> > that has been freed already causing the kernel to crash.
> >
> > Address this by using cdev->lock in thermal_debug_cdev_remove() around
> > the cdev->debugfs value check (in case the same cdev is removed at the
> > same time in two different threads) and its reset to NULL.
> >
> > Fixes: 755113d76786 ("thermal/debugfs: Add thermal cooling device debugfs information")
> > Cc :6.8+ <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 6.8+
> > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > ---
> >
> > v1 -> v2: Add missing mutex_unlock() (Lukasz).
> >
> > ---
> >   drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.c |   14 +++++++++++---
> >   1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.c
> > +++ linux-pm/drivers/thermal/thermal_debugfs.c
> > @@ -505,15 +505,23 @@ void thermal_debug_cdev_add(struct therm
> >    */
> >   void thermal_debug_cdev_remove(struct thermal_cooling_device *cdev)
> >   {
> > -     struct thermal_debugfs *thermal_dbg = cdev->debugfs;
> > +     struct thermal_debugfs *thermal_dbg;
> >
> > -     if (!thermal_dbg)
> > +     mutex_lock(&cdev->lock);
> > +
> > +     thermal_dbg = cdev->debugfs;
> > +     if (!thermal_dbg) {
> > +             mutex_unlock(&cdev->lock);
> >               return;
> > +     }
> > +
> > +     cdev->debugfs = NULL;
> > +
> > +     mutex_unlock(&cdev->lock);
> >
> >       mutex_lock(&thermal_dbg->lock);
> >
> >       thermal_debugfs_cdev_clear(&thermal_dbg->cdev_dbg);
> > -     cdev->debugfs = NULL;
> >
> >       mutex_unlock(&thermal_dbg->lock);
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
> It looks good now
>
> Reviewed-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@....com>

Thanks!