linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 14/14] selftests/sgx: Add scripts for EPC cgroup testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 07:28:46 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
 "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
 "tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com" <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org" <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>,
 "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
 "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "mkoutny@...e.com" <mkoutny@...e.com>,
 "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
 "haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com" <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>,
 "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>, "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
 "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>, "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com" <mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>,
 "anakrish@...rosoft.com" <anakrish@...rosoft.com>,
 "Zhang, Bo" <zhanb@...rosoft.com>,
 "kristen@...ux.intel.com" <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "yangjie@...rosoft.com" <yangjie@...rosoft.com>,
 "Li, Zhiquan1" <zhiquan1.li@...el.com>,
 "chrisyan@...rosoft.com" <chrisyan@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 14/14] selftests/sgx: Add scripts for EPC cgroup
 testing

On 4/16/24 07:15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue Apr 16, 2024 at 8:42 AM EEST, Huang, Kai wrote:
> Yes, exactly. I'd take one week break and cycle the kselftest part
> internally a bit as I said my previous response. I'm sure that there
> is experise inside Intel how to implement it properly. I.e. take some
> time to find the right person, and wait as long as that person has a
> bit of bandwidth to go through the test and suggest modifications.

Folks, I worry that this series is getting bogged down in the selftests.
 Yes, selftests are important.  But getting _some_ tests in the kernel
is substantially more important than getting perfect tests.

I don't think Haitao needs to "cycle" this back inside Intel.