lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:51:00 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the mm tree

On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:55:40PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got conflicts in:
> 
>   include/linux/kfifo.h
>   lib/kfifo.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   a8372870a0ae ("kfifo: don't use "proxy" headers")
> 
> from the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:
> 
>   d52b761e4b1a ("kfifo: add kfifo_dma_out_prepare_mapped()")
> 
> from the tty tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

This is correct fix from my point of view, thank you!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ