[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Ziu_VIoE9L5iP9Pr@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:51:00 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Jiri Slaby (SUSE)" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tty tree with the mm tree
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:55:40PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the tty tree got conflicts in:
>
> include/linux/kfifo.h
> lib/kfifo.c
>
> between commit:
>
> a8372870a0ae ("kfifo: don't use "proxy" headers")
>
> from the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:
>
> d52b761e4b1a ("kfifo: add kfifo_dma_out_prepare_mapped()")
>
> from the tty tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
This is correct fix from my point of view, thank you!
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists