[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZivDpyUgTinFbQh4@black.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 18:11:56 +0300
From: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Claudiu <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
jirislaby@...nel.org, tony@...mide.com, l.sanfilippo@...bus.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, geert+renesas@...der.be, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
peng.fan@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-serial@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea.uj@...renesas.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [RFT PATCH v2] serial: core: Call device_set_awake_path() for
console port
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:50:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> The rest makes sense to me as we also have an internal hack to achieve
> something similar in the case of Intel LPSS (8250_dw).
>
> But I like Tony to comment on this, from my perspective it's good:
> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
Yes nice, makes sense to me too:
Reviewed-by: Tony Lindgren <tony.lindgren@...ux.intel.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists