linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v8 10/16] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87jzkktaui.wl-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:14:29 +0100
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Peter Zijlstra
	<peterz@...radead.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	<loongarch@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev>,
	<x86@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki"
	<rafael@...nel.org>,
	Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>,
	James Morse
	<james.morse@....com>,
	Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@...wei.com>,
	Jean-Philippe
 Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
	Catalin Marinas
	<catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
	Dave
 Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	<linuxarm@...wei.com>,
	<justin.he@....com>,
	<jianyong.wu@....com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi
	<lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 10/16] irqchip/gic-v3: Don't return errors from gic_acpi_match_gicc()

On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 14:51:20 +0100,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com> wrote:
> 
> From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> 
> gic_acpi_match_gicc() is only called via gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions().
> It should only count the number of enabled redistributors, but it
> also tries to sanity check the GICC entry, currently returning an
> error if the Enabled bit is set, but the gicr_base_address is zero.
> 
> Adding support for the online-capable bit to the sanity check will
> complicate it, for no benefit. The existing check implicitly depends on
> gic_acpi_count_gicr_regions() previous failing to find any GICR regions
> (as it is valid to have gicr_base_address of zero if the redistributors
> are described via a GICR entry).
> 
> Instead of complicating the check, remove it. Failures that happen at
> this point cause the irqchip not to register, meaning no irqs can be
> requested. The kernel grinds to a panic() pretty quickly.
>
> Without the check, MADT tables that exhibit this problem are still
> caught by gic_populate_rdist(), which helpfully also prints what went
> wrong:
> | CPU4: mpidr 100 has no re-distributor!
> 
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
> Tested-by: Miguel Luis <miguel.luis@...cle.com>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King (Oracle) <rmk+kernel@...linux.org.uk>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>

Reviewed-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.