[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240426152221.GFZivGrY86svE0RZ00@fat_crate.local>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:22:21 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Kalra, Ashish" <ashish.kalra@....com>
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
x86@...nel.org, rafael@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com,
jun.nakajima@...el.com, rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com,
thomas.lendacky@....com, michael.roth@....com, seanjc@...gle.com,
kai.huang@...el.com, bhe@...hat.com,
kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com, bdas@...hat.com,
vkuznets@...hat.com, dionnaglaze@...gle.com, anisinha@...hat.com,
jroedel@...e.de, ardb@...nel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-coco@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] efi/x86: skip efi_arch_mem_reserve() in case of
kexec.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 09:47:02AM -0500, Kalra, Ashish wrote:
> I should have mentioned *chained* guest kexec above instead of nested guest
> kexec.
What is a "chained guest kexec" now?
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists