| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:32:50 +0200
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
lvzhaoxiong@...qin.corp-partner.google.com,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...gle.com>,
Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@...hat.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>,
Joel Selvaraj <jo@...amily.in>,
Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>,
Cong Yang <yangcong5@...qin.corp-partner.google.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/8] drm/mipi-dsi: Introduce
mipi_dsi_*_write_seq_multi()
Hi Douglas.
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 04:58:37PM -0700, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The current mipi_dsi_*_write_seq() macros are non-intutitive because
> they contain a hidden "return" statement that will return out of the
> _caller_ of the macro. Let's mark them as deprecated and instead
> introduce some new macros that are more intuitive.
>
> These new macros are less optimal when an error occurs but should
> behave more optimally when there is no error. Specifically these new
> macros cause smaller code to get generated and the code size savings
> (less to fetch from RAM, less cache space used, less RAM used) are
> important. Since the error case isn't something we need to optimize
> for and these new macros are easier to understand and more flexible,
> they should be used.
The whole ignore-and-return-early-if-an-error-occured concept is nice
and make this easy to understand and use. I have a few nits in the
following, but the overall concept is nice.
Sam
>
> After converting to use these new functions, one example shows some
> nice savings while also being easier to understand.
>
> $ scripts/bloat-o-meter \
> ...after/panel-novatek-nt36672e.ko \
> ...ctx/panel-novatek-nt36672e.ko
> add/remove: 0/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 0/-988 (-988)
> Function old new delta
> nt36672e_1080x2408_60hz_init 6236 5248 -988
> Total: Before=10651, After=9663, chg -9.28%
>
> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> ---
> Right now this patch introduces two new functions in
> drm_mipi_dsi.c. Alternatively we could have changed the prototype of
> the "chatty" functions and made the deprecated macros adapt to the new
> prototype. While this sounds nice, it bloated callers of the
> deprecated functioin a bit because it caused the compiler to emit less
> optimal code. It doesn't seem terrible to add two more functions, so I
> went that way.
The concern here is when it will be cleaned up. As a minimum please
consider adding an item to todo.rst that details what should be done
to get rid of the now obsolete chatty functions so someone can pick it
up.
>
> Changes in v2:
> - New
>
> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c | 56 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 113 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
> index 1e062eda3b88..b7c75a4396e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.c
> @@ -792,6 +792,34 @@ int mipi_dsi_generic_write_chatty(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_generic_write_chatty);
>
> +/**
> + * mipi_dsi_generic_write_multi() - mipi_dsi_generic_write_chatty() w/ accum_err
> + * @ctx: Context for multiple DSI transactions
> + * @payload: buffer containing the payload
> + * @size: size of payload buffer
> + *
> + * Like mipi_dsi_generic_write_chatty() but deals with errors in a way that
> + * makes it convenient to make several calls in a row.
> + */
> +void mipi_dsi_generic_write_multi(struct mipi_dsi_multi_context *ctx,
> + const void *payload, size_t size)
> +{
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> + struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + if (ctx->accum_err)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_generic_write(dsi, payload, size);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + ctx->accum_err = ret;
> + dev_err_ratelimited(dev, "sending generic data %*ph failed: %d\n",
> + (int)size, payload, ctx->accum_err);
> + }
I see no point in using ratelimited and then change it in the next
patch.
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_generic_write_multi);
> +
> /**
> * mipi_dsi_generic_read() - receive data using a generic read packet
> * @dsi: DSI peripheral device
> @@ -908,6 +936,34 @@ int mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_chatty(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi,
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_chatty);
>
> +/**
> + * mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_multi - mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_chatty() w/ accum_err
> + * @ctx: Context for multiple DSI transactions
> + * @data: buffer containing data to be transmitted
> + * @len: size of transmission buffer
> + *
> + * Like mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_chatty() but deals with errors in a way that
> + * makes it convenient to make several calls in a row.
> + */
> +void mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_multi(struct mipi_dsi_multi_context *ctx,
> + const void *data, size_t len)
> +{
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi = ctx->dsi;
> + struct device *dev = &dsi->dev;
> + ssize_t ret;
> +
> + if (ctx->accum_err)
> + return;
> +
> + ret = mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer(dsi, data, len);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + ctx->accum_err = ret;
> + dev_err_ratelimited(dev, "sending dcs data %*ph failed: %d\n",
> + (int)len, data, ctx->accum_err);
> + }
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_multi);
> +
> /**
> * mipi_dsi_dcs_write() - send DCS write command
> * @dsi: DSI peripheral device
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> index 6d68d9927f46..379594649a42 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_mipi_dsi.h
> @@ -197,6 +197,22 @@ struct mipi_dsi_device {
> struct drm_dsc_config *dsc;
> };
>
> +/**
> + * struct mipi_dsi_multi_context - Context to call multiple MIPI DSI funcs in a row
> + * @dsi: Pointer to the MIPI DSI device
> + * @accum_err: Storage for the accumulated error over the multiple calls. Init
> + * to 0. If a function encounters an error then the error code will be
> + * stored here. If you call a function and this points to a non-zero
> + * value then the function will be a noop. This allows calling a function
> + * many times in a row and just checking the error at the end to see if
> + * any of them failed.
> + */
> +
> +struct mipi_dsi_multi_context {
> + struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi;
> + int accum_err;
> +};
Inline comments is - I think - preferred.
> +
> #define MIPI_DSI_MODULE_PREFIX "mipi-dsi:"
>
> #define to_mipi_dsi_device(__dev) container_of_const(__dev, struct mipi_dsi_device, dev)
> @@ -258,6 +274,8 @@ ssize_t mipi_dsi_generic_write(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi, const void *payload,
> size_t size);
> int mipi_dsi_generic_write_chatty(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi,
> const void *payload, size_t size);
> +void mipi_dsi_generic_write_multi(struct mipi_dsi_multi_context *ctx,
> + const void *payload, size_t size);
> ssize_t mipi_dsi_generic_read(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi, const void *params,
> size_t num_params, void *data, size_t size);
>
> @@ -283,6 +301,8 @@ ssize_t mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi,
> const void *data, size_t len);
> int mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_chatty(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi,
> const void *data, size_t len);
> +void mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_multi(struct mipi_dsi_multi_context *ctx,
> + const void *data, size_t len);
> ssize_t mipi_dsi_dcs_write(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi, u8 cmd,
> const void *data, size_t len);
> ssize_t mipi_dsi_dcs_read(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi, u8 cmd, void *data,
> @@ -319,6 +339,9 @@ int mipi_dsi_dcs_get_display_brightness_large(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi,
> * This macro will print errors for you and will RETURN FROM THE CALLING
> * FUNCTION (yes this is non-intuitive) upon error.
> *
> + * Because of the non-intuitive return behavior, THIS MACRO IS DEPRECATED.
> + * Please replace calls of it with mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi().
> + *
> * @dsi: DSI peripheral device
> * @seq: buffer containing the payload
> */
> @@ -331,12 +354,30 @@ int mipi_dsi_dcs_get_display_brightness_large(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi,
> return ret; \
> } while (0)
>
> +/**
> + * mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi - transmit data using a generic write packet
> + *
> + * This macro will print errors for you and error handling is optimized for
> + * callers that call this multiple times in a row.
> + *
> + * @ctx: Context for multiple DSI transactions
> + * @seq: buffer containing the payload
> + */
> +#define mipi_dsi_generic_write_seq_multi(ctx, seq...) \
> + do { \
> + static const u8 d[] = { seq }; \
> + mipi_dsi_generic_write_multi(ctx, d, ARRAY_SIZE(d)); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> /**
> * mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq - transmit a DCS command with payload
> *
> * This macro will print errors for you and will RETURN FROM THE CALLING
> * FUNCTION (yes this is non-intuitive) upon error.
> *
> + * Because of the non-intuitive return behavior, THIS MACRO IS DEPRECATED.
> + * Please replace calls of it with mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi().
> + *
> * @dsi: DSI peripheral device
> * @cmd: Command
> * @seq: buffer containing data to be transmitted
> @@ -350,6 +391,22 @@ int mipi_dsi_dcs_get_display_brightness_large(struct mipi_dsi_device *dsi,
> return ret; \
> } while (0)
>
> +/**
> + * mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi - transmit a DCS command with payload
> + *
> + * This macro will print errors for you and error handling is optimized for
> + * callers that call this multiple times in a row.
> + *
> + * @ctx: Context for multiple DSI transactions
> + * @cmd: Command
> + * @seq: buffer containing data to be transmitted
> + */
> +#define mipi_dsi_dcs_write_seq_multi(ctx, cmd, seq...) \
> + do { \
> + static const u8 d[] = { cmd, seq }; \
> + mipi_dsi_dcs_write_buffer_multi(ctx, d, ARRAY_SIZE(d)); \
> + } while (0)
> +
> /**
> * struct mipi_dsi_driver - DSI driver
> * @driver: device driver model driver
> --
> 2.44.0.769.g3c40516874-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists