[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d2fd91db108428680cd4ed988b36cf3f579c5ec.camel@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 08:42:42 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@....com>, mingo@...hat.com,
juri.lelli@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com,
mgorman@...e.de, bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, wuyun.abel@...edance.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, Chen Yu <yu.c.chen@...el.com>, Oliver Sang
<oliver.sang@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 08/10] sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue
On Fri, 2024-04-26 at 18:03 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> fwiw, tbench liked the previous version better.
The culprit lies somewhere in the new PREEMPT_SHORT patch.
-Mike
Powered by blists - more mailing lists