[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAJD7tkY2EwtOHh3w=e0+OC3gOPb9xCC7C36BhM0RHYPv184U+Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2024 17:51:23 -0700
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] memcg: reduce memory for the lruvec and memcg stats
On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 5:37 PM Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@...ux.dev> wrote:
>
> At the moment, the amount of memory allocated for stats related structs
> in the mem_cgroup corresponds to the size of enum node_stat_item.
> However not all fields in enum node_stat_item has corresponding memcg
> stats. So, let's use indirection mechanism similar to the one used for
> memcg vmstats management.
Just curious, does the indirection table cause any noticeable
performance impact? My guess is no, but the update paths are usually
very performance sensitive.
I guess lkp will shout at us if there are any noticeable regressions.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists