Message-ID: <CACOAw_wbCJfOpfHzsznofkP8nb=gigjwmMqrCaeUR+ago8Xo7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Apr 2024 18:23:54 -0700
From: Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>
To: Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
Cc: Juhyung Park <qkrwngud825@...il.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH 3/3] f2fs: fix false alarm on invalid block address

On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 12:30 AM Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On 2024/4/19 18:27, Juhyung Park wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 5:57 AM Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 04/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>> On 2024/4/10 4:34, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>> f2fs_ra_meta_pages can try to read ahead on invalid block address which is
> >>>> not the corruption case.
> >>>
> >>> In which case we will read ahead invalid meta pages? recovery w/ META_POR?
> >
> > In my case, it seems like it's META_SIT, and it's triggered right after mount.
>
> Ah, I see, actually it hits at this case, thanks for the information.
>
> Thanks,
>
> > fsck detects invalid_blkaddr, and when the kernel mounts it, it
> > immediately flags invalid_blkaddr again:
> >
> > [    6.333498] init: [libfs_mgr] Running /system/bin/fsck.f2fs -a -c
> > 10000 --debug-cache /dev/block/sda13
> > [    6.337671] fsck.f2fs: Info: Fix the reported corruption.
> > [    6.337947] fsck.f2fs: Info: not exist /proc/version!
> > [    6.338010] fsck.f2fs: Info: can't find /sys, assuming normal block device
> > [    6.338294] fsck.f2fs: Info: MKFS version
> > [    6.338319] fsck.f2fs:   "5.10.160-android12-9-ge5cfec41c8e2"
> > [    6.338366] fsck.f2fs: Info: FSCK version
> > [    6.338380] fsck.f2fs:   from "5.10-arter97"
> > [    6.338393] fsck.f2fs:     to "5.10-arter97"
> > [    6.338414] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock features = 1499 :  encrypt
> > verity extra_attr project_quota quota_ino casefold
> > [    6.338429] fsck.f2fs: Info: superblock encrypt level = 0, salt =
> > 00000000000000000000000000000000
> > [    6.338442] fsck.f2fs: Info: checkpoint stop reason: shutdown(180)
> > [    6.338455] fsck.f2fs: Info: fs errors: invalid_blkaddr
> > [    6.338468] fsck.f2fs: Info: Segments per section = 1
> > [    6.338480] fsck.f2fs: Info: Sections per zone = 1
> > [    6.338492] fsck.f2fs: Info: total FS sectors = 58971571 (230357 MB)
> > [    6.340599] fsck.f2fs: Info: CKPT version = 2b7e3b29
> > [    6.340620] fsck.f2fs: Info: version timestamp cur: 19789296, prev: 18407008
> > [    6.677041] fsck.f2fs: Info: checkpoint state = 46 :  crc
> > compacted_summary orphan_inodes sudden-power-off
> > [    6.677052] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 1 / 712937 (0.00%)
> > [    8.997922] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 71294 / 712937 (10.00%)
> > [   10.629205] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 142587 / 712937 (20.00%)
> > [   12.278186] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 213880 / 712937 (30.00%)
> > [   13.768177] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 285173 / 712937 (40.00%)
> > [   17.446971] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 356466 / 712937 (50.00%)
> > [   19.891623] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 427759 / 712937 (60.00%)
> > [   23.251327] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 499052 / 712937 (70.00%)
> > [   28.493457] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 570345 / 712937 (80.00%)
> > [   29.640800] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 641638 / 712937 (90.00%)
> > [   30.718347] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Check node 712931 / 712937 (100.00%)
> > [   30.724176] fsck.f2fs:
> > [   30.737160] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Max image size: 167506 MB, Free space: 62850 MB
> > [   30.737164] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Unreachable nat entries
> >           [Ok..] [0x0]
> > [   30.737638] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] SIT valid block bitmap checking
> >           [Ok..]
> > [   30.737640] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] Hard link checking for regular file
> >           [Ok..] [0xd]
> > [   30.737641] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_block_count matching with CP
> >           [Ok..] [0x28b98e6]
> > [   30.737644] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_node_count matching with CP (de
> > lookup)  [Ok..] [0xae0e9]
> > [   30.737646] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_node_count matching with CP
> > (nat lookup) [Ok..] [0xae0e9]
> > [   30.737647] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] valid_inode_count matched with CP
> >           [Ok..] [0xa74a3]
> > [   30.737649] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] free segment_count matched with CP
> >           [Ok..] [0x7aa3]
> > [   30.737662] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] next block offset is free
> >           [Ok..]
> > [   30.737663] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] fixing SIT types
> > [   30.737867] fsck.f2fs: [FSCK] other corrupted bugs
> >           [Ok..]
> > [   30.737893] fsck.f2fs: [update_superblock: 765] Info: Done to
> > update superblock
> > [   30.960610] fsck.f2fs:
> > [   30.960618] fsck.f2fs: Done: 24.622956 secs
> > [   30.960620] fsck.f2fs:
> > [   30.960622] fsck.f2fs: c, u, RA, CH, CM, Repl=
> > [   30.960627] fsck.f2fs: 10000 10000 43600517 42605434 995083 985083
> > [   30.963274] F2FS-fs (sda13): Using encoding defined by superblock:
> > utf8-12.1.0 with flags 0x0
> > [   30.995360] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr: type=2
> >
> > (Manually added that print ^)
> >
> > [   30.995369] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > [   30.995375] WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 1 at f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c
> > [   30.995378] CPU: 7 PID: 1 Comm: init Tainted: G S      W
> > 5.10.209-arter97-r15-kernelsu-g0867d0e4f1d2 #6
> > [   30.995379] Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Cape QRD
> > with PM8010 (DT)
> > [   30.995380] pstate: 22400005 (nzCv daif +PAN -UAO +TCO BTYPE=--)
> > [   30.995382] pc : f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c
> > [   30.995384] lr : __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x2a4/0x2b0
> > [   30.995385] sp : ffffff80209e79b0
> > [   30.995386] x29: ffffff80209e79b0 x28: 0000000000000037
> > [   30.995388] x27: 00000000000001c7 x26: 0000000020120121
> > [   30.995389] x25: 00000000000000d9 x24: 0000000000000000
> > [   30.995390] x23: ffffffff00f1a700 x22: 0000000000000828
> > [   30.995391] x21: ffffff80462aa000 x20: ffffff80462aa000
> > [   30.995392] x19: 0000000000000002 x18: ffffffffffffffff
> > [   30.995393] x17: 0000000000000000 x16: 00000000ffff0000
> > [   30.995394] x15: 0000000000000004 x14: ffffffd1675ac6d0
> > [   30.995395] x13: 0000000000000003 x12: 0000000000000003
> > [   30.995396] x11: 00000000ffffffff x10: 0000000000000000
> > [   30.995397] x9 : 0000000100000001 x8 : 0000000100000000
> > [   30.995398] x7 : 64696c61765f7369 x6 : ffffffd1681279e8
> > [   30.995399] x5 : 000000000000001f x4 : 0000000000000001
> > [   30.995400] x3 : 0000000000000000 x2 : ffffff89f03dedc8
> > [   30.995401] x1 : 0000000000000002 x0 : ffffff80462aa000
> > [   30.995403] Call trace:
> > [   30.995404] f2fs_handle_error+0x18/0x3c
> > [   30.995405] __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x2a4/0x2b0
> > [   30.995406] f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr+0x10/0x20
> > [   30.995407] f2fs_ra_meta_pages+0xe0/0x230
> > [   30.995409] build_sit_entries+0xa8/0x580
> > [   30.995411] f2fs_build_segment_manager+0x124/0x170
> > [   30.995412] f2fs_fill_super+0x78c/0xd1c
> > [   30.995415] mount_bdev+0x168/0x1ac
> > [   30.995416] f2fs_mount+0x18/0x24
> > [   30.995418] legacy_get_tree.llvm.9147845779559715083+0x30/0x5c
> > [   30.995419] vfs_get_tree+0x30/0xe0
> > [   30.995421] do_new_mount+0x140/0x358
> > [   30.995422] path_mount+0x1fc/0x4e8
> > [   30.995423] __arm64_sys_mount+0x150/0x294
> > [   30.995425] el0_svc_common.llvm.15698454952154965787+0xa8/0x138
> > [   30.995426] do_el0_svc+0x24/0x90
> > [   30.995429] el0_svc+0x10/0x1c
> > [   30.995430] el0_sync_handler+0xcc/0xe4
> > [   30.995432] el0_sync+0x1a0/0x1c0
> > [   30.995433] ---[ end trace 3b83295e0cdac94e ]---
> > [   31.005011] F2FS-fs (sda13): Mounted with checkpoint version = 2b7e3b29
> > [   31.005176] init: [libfs_mgr]
> > __mount(source=/dev/block/bootdevice/by-name/userdata,target=/data,type=f2fs)=0:
> > Success
> > [   31.007749] init: Userdata mounted using /vendor/etc/fstab.qcom result : 0
> >
> >
> > I was bisecting a long boot time (24 additional seconds) issue, which
> > is always reproducible, and found commit 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify
> > the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr") to be causing it.
> >
> > I'll just revert that patch locally. Seems like Jaegeuk's dev branch
> > doesn't have the fix for this specifically yet.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> >>
> >> I was trying to debug another issue, but found the root cause. Let me drop this
> >> patch.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Fixes: 31f85ccc84b8 ("f2fs: unify the error handling of f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr")
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
> >>>> ---
> >>>>    fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c | 9 +++++----
> >>>>    1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >>>> index eac698b8dd38..b01320502624 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/checkpoint.c
> >>>> @@ -179,22 +179,22 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>              break;
> >>>>      case META_SIT:
> >>>>              if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_BLK_CNT(sbi)))
> >>>> -                   goto err;
> >>>> +                   goto check_only;
> >>>>              break;
> >>>>      case META_SSA:
> >>>>              if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
> >>>>                      blkaddr < SM_I(sbi)->ssa_blkaddr))
> >>>> -                   goto err;
> >>>> +                   goto check_only;
> >>>>              break;
> >>>>      case META_CP:
> >>>>              if (unlikely(blkaddr >= SIT_I(sbi)->sit_base_addr ||
> >>>>                      blkaddr < __start_cp_addr(sbi)))
> >>>> -                   goto err;
> >>>> +                   goto check_only;
> >>>>              break;
> >>>>      case META_POR:
> >>>>              if (unlikely(blkaddr >= MAX_BLKADDR(sbi) ||
> >>>>                      blkaddr < MAIN_BLKADDR(sbi)))
> >>>> -                   goto err;
> >>>> +                   goto check_only;
> >>>>              break;
> >>>>      case DATA_GENERIC:
> >>>>      case DATA_GENERIC_ENHANCE:
> >>>> @@ -228,6 +228,7 @@ static bool __f2fs_is_valid_blkaddr(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> >>>>      return true;
> >>>>    err:
> >>>>      f2fs_handle_error(sbi, ERROR_INVALID_BLKADDR);
> >>>> +check_only:
> >>>>      return false;
> >>>>    }
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> >> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-f2fs-devel mailing list
> Linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/linux-f2fs-devel

I have a question. Is it okay for META_GENERIC?

Powered by blists - more mailing lists