[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <uh2onuws3or5ikefsflvobijxhxxoersvdwtzcuu264efqjsk4@kbmmpue4wqb5>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 14:15:11 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>, Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/15] i2c: st: use 'time_left' variable with
wait_for_completion_timeout()
Hello Wolfram,
On Sat, Apr 27, 2024 at 10:35:59PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> There is a confusing pattern in the kernel to use a variable named 'timeout' to
> store the result of wait_for_completion_timeout() causing patterns like:
>
> timeout = wait_for_completion_timeout(...)
> if (!timeout) return -ETIMEDOUT;
>
> with all kinds of permutations. Use 'time_left' as a variable to make the code
> self explaining.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>
I like the improvement in general and looking at this driver in more
detail this looks right.
Reviewed-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists