[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240428173422.7c0f44cf@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:34:22 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Aren Moynihan <aren@...cevolution.org>, Lars-Peter Clausen
<lars@...afoo.de>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>, Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>, Uwe
Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-sunxi@...ts.linux.dev, Willow
Barraco <contact@...lowbarraco.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/6] iio: light: stk3310: Implement vdd supply and
power it off during suspend
On Wed, 24 Apr 2024 02:16:06 +0300
Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 24, 2024 at 1:41 AM Aren Moynihan <aren@...cevolutionorg> wrote:
> >
> > From: Ondrej Jirman <megi@....cz>
> >
> > VDD power input can be used to completely power off the chip during
> > system suspend. Do so if available.
>
> ...
>
> > ret = stk3310_init(indio_dev);
> > if (ret < 0)
> > - return ret;
> > + goto err_vdd_disable;
>
> This is wrong. You will have the regulator being disabled _before_
> IRQ. Note, that the original code likely has a bug which sets states
> before disabling IRQ and removing a handler.
>
> Side note, you may make the driver neater with help of
>
> struct device *dev = &client->dev;
>
> defined in this patch.
>
> ...
>
> > static int stk3310_suspend(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > struct stk3310_data *data;
>
> > data = iio_priv(i2c_get_clientdata(to_i2c_client(dev)));
>
> Side note: This may be updated (in a separate change) to use
> dev_get_drvdata() directly.
>
> Jonathan, do we have something like iio_priv_from_drvdata(struct
> device *dev)? Seems many drivers may utilise it.
Not yet, but I'm not sure it's a good idea as there is no inherent
reason to assume the drvdata is a struct iio_dev. It often is but
adding a function that assumes that is a path to subtle bugs.
Jonathan
>
> > }
>
> ...
>
> > static int stk3310_resume(struct device *dev)
>
> Ditto.
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists