[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240428182714.GGZi6VAr-oBybEOXnO@fat_crate.local>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 20:27:14 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Si, Bingsong" <sibs@...natelecom.cn>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"patches@...ts.linux.dev" <patches@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 29/71] x86/cpu/intel: Switch to new Intel CPU model
defines
On Thu, Apr 25, 2024 at 04:29:37PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> But since it is only used in one place, I should just do that test inline without
> a helper:
>
> if (c->x86_vfm == spectre_bad_microcodes[i].vfm &&
> c->x86_stepping == spectre_bad_microcodes[i].stepping)
> return (c->microcode <= spectre_bad_microcodes[i].microcode);
Right.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists