[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20240428194326.2836387-2-ogustavo@usp.br>
Date: Sun, 28 Apr 2024 16:43:24 -0300
From: ogustavo@....br
To: lars@...afoo.de,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com,
jic23@...nel.org
Cc: Gustavo Rodrigues <ogustavo@....br>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bruna Lopes <brunaafl@....br>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] iio: adc: ad799x: change 'unsigned' to 'unsigned int' declaration
From: Gustavo Rodrigues <ogustavo@....br>
Prefer 'unsigned int' instead of bare use of 'unsigned' declarations to
to improve code readbility. This ceases one of the warning messages
pointed by checkpatch.
Co-developed-by: Bruna Lopes <brunaafl@....br>
Signed-off-by: Bruna Lopes <brunaafl@....br>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Rodrigues <ogustavo@....br>
---
drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c b/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c
index b757cc45c4de..3040575793a2 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ad799x.c
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ struct ad799x_state {
struct regulator *vref;
/* lock to protect against multiple access to the device */
struct mutex lock;
- unsigned id;
+ unsigned int id;
u16 config;
u8 *rx_buf;
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@ static int ad799x_update_scan_mode(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
}
}
-static int ad799x_scan_direct(struct ad799x_state *st, unsigned ch)
+static int ad799x_scan_direct(struct ad799x_state *st, unsigned int ch)
{
u8 cmd;
--
2.34.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists