linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Fix thinko comparing x86_vfm with x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <SJ1PR11MB6083B53C58D36ADB74C08AABFC1B2@SJ1PR11MB6083.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 16:05:29 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC: "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>,
	"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Fix thinko comparing x86_vfm with x86_model

> and why in the hell are there 2 or 3 patches of the same name touching
> the same thing? Why can't they be a single patch?

I made one patch per file touched (wherever possible ... there are a few patches
where ".h" and ".c" files needed to be bundled together).

> Lemme rebase the lot.

Thanks. I just did a "git fetch" the x86/cpu branch. It all looks good.

-Tony