linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] iommu/dma: Centralise iommu_setup_dma

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:31:19 +0300
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
	Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...nel.org>,
	Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
	WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
	Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>,
	Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@...nel.org>,
	Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
	"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@...rosoft.com>,
	Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>,
	Wei Liu <wei.liu@...nel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>,
	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
	Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Matthew Rosato <mjrosato@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Gerald Schaefer <gerald.schaefer@...ux.ibm.com>,
	Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org,
	iommu@...ts.linux.dev, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 6/7] iommu/dma: Centralise iommu_setup_dma_ops()

On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 05:54:45PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> It's somewhat hard to see, but arm64's arch_setup_dma_ops() should only
> ever call iommu_setup_dma_ops() after a successful iommu_probe_device(),
> which means there should be no harm in achieving the same order of
> operations by running it off the back of iommu_probe_device() itself.
> This then puts it in line with the x86 and s390 .probe_finalize bodges,
> letting us pull it all into the main flow properly. As a bonus this lets
> us fold in and de-scope the PCI workaround setup as well.
> 
> At this point we can also then pull the call up inside the group mutex,
> and avoid having to think about whether iommu_group_store_type() could
> theoretically race and free the domain if iommu_setup_dma_ops() ran just
> *before* iommu_device_use_default_domain() claims it... Furthermore we
> replace one .probe_finalize call completely, since the only remaining
> implementations are now one which only needs to run once for the initial
> boot-time probe, and two which themselves render that path unreachable.
> 
> This leaves us a big step closer to realistically being able to unpick
> the variety of different things that iommu_setup_dma_ops() has been
> muddling together, and further streamline iommu-dma into core API flows
> in future.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com> # For Intel IOMMU
> Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
> Tested-by: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
> ---
> v2: Shuffle around to make sure the iommu_group_do_probe_finalize() case
>     is covered as well, with bonus side-effects as above.
> v3: *Really* do that, remembering the other two probe_finalize sites too.
> ---
>  arch/arm64/mm/dma-mapping.c  |  2 --
>  drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c    |  8 --------
>  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c    | 18 ++++++------------
>  drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.h    | 14 ++++++--------
>  drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c  |  7 -------
>  drivers/iommu/iommu.c        | 20 +++++++-------------
>  drivers/iommu/s390-iommu.c   |  6 ------
>  drivers/iommu/virtio-iommu.c | 10 ----------
>  include/linux/iommu.h        |  7 -------
>  9 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)

This patch breaks UFS on Qualcomm SC8180X Primus platform:


[    3.846856] arm-smmu 15000000.iommu: Unhandled context fault: fsr=0x402, iova=0x1032db3e0, fsynr=0x130000, cbfrsynra=0x300, cb=4
[    3.846880] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: ufshcd_check_errors: saved_err 0x20000 saved_uic_err 0x0
[    3.846929] host_regs: 00000000: 1587031f 00000000 00000300 00000000
[    3.846935] host_regs: 00000010: 01000000 00010217 00000000 00000000
[    3.846941] host_regs: 00000020: 00000000 00070ef5 00000000 00000000
[    3.846946] host_regs: 00000030: 0000000f 00000001 00000000 00000000
[    3.846951] host_regs: 00000040: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[    3.846956] host_regs: 00000050: 032db000 00000001 00000000 00000000
[    3.846962] host_regs: 00000060: 00000000 80000000 00000000 00000000
[    3.846967] host_regs: 00000070: 032dd000 00000001 00000000 00000000
[    3.846972] host_regs: 00000080: 00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
[    3.846977] host_regs: 00000090: 00000016 00000000 00000000 0000000c
[    3.847074] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: ufshcd_err_handler started; HBA state eh_fatal; powered 1; shutting down 0; saved_err = 131072; saved_uic_err = 0; force_reset = 0
[    4.406550] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: ufshcd_verify_dev_init: NOP OUT failed -11
[    4.417953] ufshcd-qcom 1d84000.ufshc: ufshcd_async_scan failed: -11

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry