linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v12 14/14] selftests/sgx: Add scripts for EPC cgroup testing

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 19:43:05 +0300
From: "Jarkko Sakkinen" <jarkko@...nel.org>
To: "Haitao Huang" <haitao.huang@...ux.intel.com>, "Dave Hansen"
 <dave.hansen@...el.com>, "Huang, Kai" <kai.huang@...el.com>,
 "hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com"
 <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, "linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org"
 <linux-sgx@...r.kernel.org>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
 "dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com" <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "cgroups@...r.kernel.org" <cgroups@...r.kernel.org>,
 "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 "mkoutny@...e.com" <mkoutny@...e.com>, "tglx@...utronix.de"
 <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Mehta, Sohil" <sohil.mehta@...el.com>,
 "tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>, "mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
 "bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com" <mikko.ylinen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "seanjc@...gle.com" <seanjc@...gle.com>, "anakrish@...rosoft.com"
 <anakrish@...rosoft.com>, "Zhang, Bo" <zhanb@...rosoft.com>,
 "kristen@...ux.intel.com" <kristen@...ux.intel.com>,
 "yangjie@...rosoft.com" <yangjie@...rosoft.com>, "Li, Zhiquan1"
 <zhiquan1.li@...el.com>, "chrisyan@...rosoft.com" <chrisyan@...rosoft.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 14/14] selftests/sgx: Add scripts for EPC cgroup
 testing

On Mon Apr 29, 2024 at 7:18 PM EEST, Haitao Huang wrote:
> Hi Jarkko
>
> On Sun, 28 Apr 2024 17:03:17 -0500, Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>  
> wrote:
>
> > On Fri Apr 26, 2024 at 5:28 PM EEST, Dave Hansen wrote:
> >> On 4/16/24 07:15, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> >> > On Tue Apr 16, 2024 at 8:42 AM EEST, Huang, Kai wrote:
> >> > Yes, exactly. I'd take one week break and cycle the kselftest part
> >> > internally a bit as I said my previous response. I'm sure that there
> >> > is experise inside Intel how to implement it properly. I.e. take some
> >> > time to find the right person, and wait as long as that person has a
> >> > bit of bandwidth to go through the test and suggest modifications.
> >>
> >> Folks, I worry that this series is getting bogged down in the selftests.
> >>  Yes, selftests are important.  But getting _some_ tests in the kernel
> >> is substantially more important than getting perfect tests.
> >>
> >> I don't think Haitao needs to "cycle" this back inside Intel.
> >
> > The problem with the tests was that they are hard to run anything else
> > than Ubuntu (and perhaps Debian). It is hopefully now taken care of.
> > Selftests do not have to be perfect but at minimum they need to be
> > runnable.
> >
> > I need ret-test the latest series because it is possible that I did not
> > have right flags (I was travelling few days thus have not done it yet).
> >
> > BR, Jarkko
> >
>
> Let me know if you want me to send v13 before testing or you can just use  
> the sgx_cg_upstream_v12_plus branch in my repo.
>
> Also thanks for the "Reviewed-by" tags for other patches. But I've not got  
> "Reviewed-by" from you for patches #8-12 (not sure I missed). Could you go  
> through those alsoe when you get chance?

So, I compiled v12 branch. Was the only difference in selftests?

I can just copy them to the device.

BR, Jarkko