[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9c711441-6e79-422f-9405-ee271929e77c@web.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 07:12:17 +0200
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Yongzhi Liu <hyperlyzcs@...il.com>,
GR-QLogic-Storage-Upstream@...vell.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
Nilesh Javali <njavali@...vell.com>, Saurav Kashyap <skashyap@...vell.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Himanshu Madhani <himanshu.madhani@...cle.com>, huntazhang@...cent.com,
jitxie@...cent.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: qla2xxx: Fix double free of fcport in error
handling path
…> Fix this by cleaning up the redundant qla2x00_free_fcport() and
> replacing error handling with a goto chain.
I imagine that there can be a need to provide the desired software adjustment
as a patch series with two separate update steps.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.9-rc5#n81
* Deletion of inappropriate function calls
* Optimisation of exception handling
How do you think about to refer to the affected function
(instead of the hint “error handling path”) in the summary phrase?
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists