lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZjAduvtEZAjwoG+v@ghost>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 15:22:50 -0700
From: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
	Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
	Clément Léger <cleger@...osinc.com>,
	Evan Green <evan@...osinc.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...osinc.com>,
	linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] riscv: cpufeature: Fix thead vector hwcap removal

On Mon, Apr 29, 2024 at 11:33:50AM +0200, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 02:58:54PM GMT, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > The riscv_cpuinfo struct that contains mvendorid and marchid is not
> > populated until all harts are booted which happens after the DT parsing.
> > Use the vendorid/archid values from the DT if available or assume all
> > harts have the same values as the boot hart as a fallback.
> > 
> > Fixes: d82f32202e0d ("RISC-V: Ignore V from the riscv,isa DT property on older T-Head CPUs")
> > Signed-off-by: Charlie Jenkins <charlie@...osinc.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
> > ---
> >  arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h   |  2 ++
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c        | 40 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> >  arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c | 11 +++++++++--
> >  3 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > index 6e68f8dff76b..0fab508a65b3 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/sbi.h
> > @@ -370,6 +370,8 @@ static inline int sbi_remote_fence_i(const struct cpumask *cpu_mask) { return -1
> >  static inline void sbi_init(void) {}
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_RISCV_SBI */
> >  
> > +unsigned long riscv_get_mvendorid(void);
> > +unsigned long riscv_get_marchid(void);
> >  unsigned long riscv_cached_mvendorid(unsigned int cpu_id);
> >  unsigned long riscv_cached_marchid(unsigned int cpu_id);
> >  unsigned long riscv_cached_mimpid(unsigned int cpu_id);
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> > index d11d6320fb0d..c1f3655238fd 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpu.c
> > @@ -139,6 +139,34 @@ int riscv_of_parent_hartid(struct device_node *node, unsigned long *hartid)
> >  	return -1;
> >  }
> >  
> > +unsigned long __init riscv_get_marchid(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct riscv_cpuinfo *ci = this_cpu_ptr(&riscv_cpuinfo);
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI)
> > +	ci->marchid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_marchid();
> > +#elif IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE)
> > +	ci->marchid = csr_read(CSR_MARCHID);
> > +#else
> > +	ci->marchid = 0;
> > +#endif
> > +	return ci->marchid;
> > +}
> > +
> > +unsigned long __init riscv_get_mvendorid(void)
> > +{
> > +	struct riscv_cpuinfo *ci = this_cpu_ptr(&riscv_cpuinfo);
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI)
> > +	ci->mvendorid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_mvendorid();
> > +#elif IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE)
> > +	ci->mvendorid = csr_read(CSR_MVENDORID);
> > +#else
> > +	ci->mvendorid = 0;
> > +#endif
> > +	return ci->mvendorid;
> > +}
> > +
> >  DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct riscv_cpuinfo, riscv_cpuinfo);
> >  
> >  unsigned long riscv_cached_mvendorid(unsigned int cpu_id)
> > @@ -170,12 +198,16 @@ static int riscv_cpuinfo_starting(unsigned int cpu)
> >  	struct riscv_cpuinfo *ci = this_cpu_ptr(&riscv_cpuinfo);
> >  
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_SBI)
> > -	ci->mvendorid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_mvendorid();
> > -	ci->marchid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_marchid();
> > +	if (!ci->mvendorid)
> > +		ci->mvendorid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_mvendorid();
> > +	if (!ci->marchid)
> > +		ci->marchid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_marchid();
> >  	ci->mimpid = sbi_spec_is_0_1() ? 0 : sbi_get_mimpid();
> >  #elif IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_M_MODE)
> > -	ci->mvendorid = csr_read(CSR_MVENDORID);
> > -	ci->marchid = csr_read(CSR_MARCHID);
> > +	if (!ci->mvendorid)
> > +		ci->mvendorid = csr_read(CSR_MVENDORID);
> > +	if (!ci->marchid)
> > +		ci->marchid = csr_read(CSR_MARCHID);
> >  	ci->mimpid = csr_read(CSR_MIMPID);
> >  #else
> >  	ci->mvendorid = 0;
> > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > index 3ed2359eae35..500a9bd70f51 100644
> > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/cpufeature.c
> > @@ -490,6 +490,8 @@ static void __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_isa_string(unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
> >  	struct acpi_table_header *rhct;
> >  	acpi_status status;
> >  	unsigned int cpu;
> > +	u64 boot_vendorid;
> > +	u64 boot_archid;
> >  
> >  	if (!acpi_disabled) {
> >  		status = acpi_get_table(ACPI_SIG_RHCT, 0, &rhct);
> > @@ -497,6 +499,9 @@ static void __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_isa_string(unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
> >  			return;
> >  	}
> >  
> > +	boot_vendorid = riscv_get_mvendorid();
> > +	boot_archid = riscv_get_marchid();
> > +
> >  	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> >  		struct riscv_isainfo *isainfo = &hart_isa[cpu];
> >  		unsigned long this_hwcap = 0;
> > @@ -543,9 +548,11 @@ static void __init riscv_fill_hwcap_from_isa_string(unsigned long *isa2hwcap)
> >  		 * version of the vector specification put "v" into their DTs.
> >  		 * CPU cores with the ratified spec will contain non-zero
> >  		 * marchid.
> > +		 *
> > +		 * Assume that if the boot hart is T-Head, then all harts in the
> > +		 * SoC are also T-Head and have the same archid.
> 
> The movement of the comment is only half of my suggestion. The other
> suggestion is to remove the 'Assume' because we don't have to assume
> anything. We can simply state that if the boot hart is T-HEAD, then we
> don't want to enable V on any hart. (We don't need to assume the other
> hart IDs are the same, because we don't care what they are. They're
> not going to get V, no matter what.)

In the case that you mentioned, that the boot hart incorrectly reports
xtheadvector as V but a different hart has "true" V, V will be disabled
and all is well.

This comment was more out of paranoia for the inverse case though. It is
possible that the boot hart has a correctly reported V, but a different
hart actually has xtheadvector. Since we only probed the boot hart, we
don't know that though, and try to execute standard V instructions on
the secondary hart and run into illegal exceptions.

I can change the wording to:

"Disable vector if the boot hart has a T-Head mvendorid and an marchid
of 0."

I hope some vendor doesn't make an SoC like the problem case ;).

- Charlie

> 
> Thanks,
> drew
> 
> >  		 */
> > -		if (acpi_disabled && riscv_cached_mvendorid(cpu) == THEAD_VENDOR_ID &&
> > -		    riscv_cached_marchid(cpu) == 0x0) {
> > +		if (acpi_disabled && boot_vendorid == THEAD_VENDOR_ID && boot_archid == 0x0) {
> >  			this_hwcap &= ~isa2hwcap[RISCV_ISA_EXT_v];
> >  			clear_bit(RISCV_ISA_EXT_v, isainfo->isa);
> >  		}
> > 
> > -- 
> > 2.44.0
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > linux-riscv mailing list
> > linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
> > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ