linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-sk: Add bootph-all property in phy_gmii

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:26:16 +0200
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Chintan Vankar <c-vankar@...com>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>,
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
 Tero Kristo <kristo@...nel.org>, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@...com>,
 Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, s-vadapalli@...com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am625-sk: Add bootph-all property
 in phy_gmii_sel node

On 29/04/2024 08:58, Chintan Vankar wrote:
> 
> 
> On 29/04/24 12:12, Chintan Vankar wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 29/04/24 12:08, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> Are you sure you kept proper ordering of nodes or just stuffed this to
>>> the end?
>>
>> Yes, I added this node at the end.
> 
> Is it okay to add it at the end or it should be defined after "cpsw3g"
> node ?

What is the ordering for this subarch? What does the DTS coding style say?

Best regards,
Krzysztof