linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] serial: msm: Unify TX and RX DMA paths

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 09:36:08 +0200
From: neil.armstrong@...aro.org
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
 linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: msm: Unify TX and RX DMA paths

Hi Greg,

On 24/04/2024 01:33, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 04:08:04PM +0200, neil.armstrong@...aro.org wrote:
>> Hi Marek,
>>
>> On 23/04/2024 14:08, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>> Use scatterlist-based API also for RX mode to unify TX and RX DMA paths
>>> as well as simplify the whole driver code a bit.
>>
>> Thanks for the patch, I have no idea if this is right or wrong.
>>
>> Greg, I think we should wait until this change is fully tested on multiple
>> platforms including DMA usage (bluetooth) before aplying it.
> 
> Great, who is going to test that without me adding it to linux-next?

Qcom developers, reviewers and maintainers will review it and test it like
any other patch affecting the qcom platform.

Thanks,
Neil

> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h