linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] iio: adis16480: add support for adis16545/7 families

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 10:01:42 +0200
From: Nuno Sá <noname.nuno@...il.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Ramona Gradinariu
	 <ramona.bolboaca13@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, 
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, corbet@....net, 
 conor+dt@...nel.org, krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, robh@...nel.org,
 Ramona Gradinariu <ramona.gradinariu@...log.com>, Nuno
 Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] iio: adis16480: add support for adis16545/7 families

On Sun, 2024-04-28 at 16:25 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Apr 2024 11:42:09 +0300
> Ramona Gradinariu <ramona.bolboaca13@...il.com> wrote:
> 
> > The ADIS16545 and ADIS16547 are a complete inertial system that
> > includes a triaxis gyroscope and a triaxis accelerometer.
> > The serial peripheral interface (SPI) and register structure provide a
> > simple interface for data collection and configuration control.
> > 
> > These devices are similar to the ones already supported in the driver,
> > with changes in the scales, timings and the max spi speed in burst
> > mode.
> > Also, they support delta angle and delta velocity readings in burst
> > mode, for which support was added in the trigger handler.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>
> 
> What is Nuno's relationship to this patch?  You are author and the sender
> which is fine, but in that case you need to make Nuno's involvement explicit.
> Perhaps a Co-developed-by or similar is appropriate?
> 

Ah and regarding this is that I guess Ramona just modified my internal patches
adding support for these parts long ago (when they were not public yet). Not
sure how much did she changed but a Co-developed-by looks the way to go...

- Nuno Sá
>