linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: light: stk3310: Drop most likely fake ACPI ID

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Zi9cLbf6JdomA8jW@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:37:01 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	Martijn Braam <martijn@...xit.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] iio: light: stk3310: Drop most likely fake ACPI ID

On Sun, Apr 28, 2024 at 04:43:33PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2024 14:06:16 +0300
> Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com> wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 22, 2024 at 02:04:23PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:

..

> > P.S>  
> > What I may agree on is to drop Fixes tag.
> > 
> That's a compromise I'm fine with. As long as we've done due diligence on
> whether there are known cases we can take the risk of breaking someone (briefly)
> if these turn out to be in use.

I'll try to remember not putting Fixes in similar patches in the future,
if any.

> Applied,

Thank you!

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko