[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <836c267f-a028-acce-8b19-180162a5febc@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:05:12 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Matz <matz@...e.de>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...nel.org>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+git@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>,
Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...nel.org>,
Fangrui Song <maskray@...gle.com>, Arthur Eubanks <aeubanks@...gle.com>,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/purgatory: Switch to the position-independent small
code model
Hello,
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Interesting. I thought gcc doesn't have problems here yet and was
> talking to Matz on Thu about it and it seems he's forgotten about his
> statement too that "you should simply stop using -mcmodel=large. Noone
> should use it." :-)
It may be so ingrained in my brain that I'm not _always_ saying it when
talking about the large code model over a beer. And indeed I know of no
particular problems with it vis GCC, but that doesn't mean it's a good
idea to use :-)
So once again: "everyone should simply stop using -mcmodel=large. Noone
should use it."
So the patch goes strictly into the direction of betterment of the
universe. :)
Ciao,
Michael.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists