[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240429124955.2294014-6-rrichter@amd.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 14:49:53 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, "Peter
Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, "Ingo
Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, <x86@...nel.org>
CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, Alison Schofield
<alison.schofield@...el.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, Robert Richter
<rrichter@....com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Len Brown
<lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5 5/7] ACPI/NUMA: Return memblk modification state from numa_fill_memblks()
When registering a memory range a possibly overlapping memory block
will be extended instead of creating a new one. If both ranges exactly
overlap, the blocks remain unchanged and are just reused. The
information if a memblock was extended is useful for diagnostics.
Change return code of numa_fill_memblks() to also report if memblocks
have been modified.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ZiqnbD0CB9WUL1zu@aschofie-mobl2/T/#u
Cc: Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++---------------
drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c | 5 +++--
2 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index ce84ba86e69e..e34e96d57656 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -950,15 +950,16 @@ static struct numa_memblk *numa_memblk_list[NR_NODE_MEMBLKS] __initdata;
* address range @start-@end
*
* RETURNS:
- * 0 : Success
- * NUMA_NO_MEMBLK : No memblks exist in address range @start-@end
+ * NUMA_NO_MEMBLK if no memblks exist in address range @start-@end,
+ * zero on success without blocks modified and non-zero positive
+ * values on success with blocks modified.
*/
int __init numa_fill_memblks(u64 start, u64 end)
{
struct numa_memblk **blk = &numa_memblk_list[0];
struct numa_meminfo *mi = &numa_meminfo;
- int count = 0;
+ int count = 0, modified = 0;
u64 prev_end;
/*
@@ -981,25 +982,27 @@ int __init numa_fill_memblks(u64 start, u64 end)
/* Sort the list of pointers in memblk->start order */
sort(&blk[0], count, sizeof(blk[0]), cmp_memblk, NULL);
- /* Make sure the first/last memblks include start/end */
- blk[0]->start = min(blk[0]->start, start);
- blk[count - 1]->end = max(blk[count - 1]->end, end);
-
/*
* Fill any gaps by tracking the previous memblks
* end address and backfilling to it if needed.
*/
- prev_end = blk[0]->end;
- for (int i = 1; i < count; i++) {
+ prev_end = start;
+ for (int i = 0; i < count; i++) {
struct numa_memblk *curr = blk[i];
- if (prev_end >= curr->start) {
- if (prev_end < curr->end)
- prev_end = curr->end;
- } else {
+ if (prev_end < curr->start) {
curr->start = prev_end;
- prev_end = curr->end;
+ modified = 1;
}
+
+ if (prev_end < curr->end)
+ prev_end = curr->end;
}
- return 0;
+
+ if (blk[count - 1]->end < end) {
+ blk[count - 1]->end = end;
+ modified = 1;
+ }
+
+ return modified;
}
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
index e3f26e71637a..76b39a6d3aef 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/numa/srat.c
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *cfmws;
int *fake_pxm = arg;
u64 start, end;
- int node;
+ int node, modified;
cfmws = (struct acpi_cedt_cfmws *)header;
start = cfmws->base_hpa;
@@ -338,7 +338,8 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_cfmws(union acpi_subtable_headers *header,
* found for any portion of the window to cover the entire
* window.
*/
- if (!numa_fill_memblks(start, end))
+ modified = numa_fill_memblks(start, end);
+ if (modified != NUMA_NO_MEMBLK)
return 0;
/* No SRAT description. Create a new node. */
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists