linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Convert to use __mmc_poll_for_busy() SD_APP_OP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <aee69bf3-ea7b-4ff3-8fd5-01e97d3381eb@126.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2024 11:30:57 +0800
From: Yao Xiao <xiaokeqinhealth@....com>
To: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>, linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, Avri Altman
 <avri.altman@....com>, Dragan Simic <dsimic@...jaro.org>,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mmc: core: Convert to use __mmc_poll_for_busy()
 SD_APP_OP_COND too

Hi ulf,

On 2024/4/25 21:30, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> Similar to what has already been changed for eMMC and the MMC_SEND_OP_COND
> (CMD1), let's convert the SD_APP_OP_COND (ACMD41) for SD cards to use the
> common __mmc_poll_for_busy() too.
> 
> This change means the initial delay period, that starts as 10ms will now
> increase for every loop when being busy. The total accepted timeout for
> being busy is 1s, which is according to the SD spec.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
> ---
>   drivers/mmc/core/sd_ops.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>   1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/core/sd_ops.c b/drivers/mmc/core/sd_ops.c
> index a59cd592f06e..3ce1ff336826 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/core/sd_ops.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/core/sd_ops.c
> @@ -19,6 +19,15 @@
>   #include "sd_ops.h"
>   #include "mmc_ops.h"
>   
> +#define SD_APP_OP_COND_PERIOD_US	(10 * 1000) /* 10ms */
> +#define SD_APP_OP_COND_TIMEOUT_MS	1000 /* 1s */
> +
> +struct sd_app_op_cond_busy_data {
> +	struct mmc_host *host;
> +	u32 ocr;
> +	struct mmc_command *cmd;
> +};
> +
>   int mmc_app_cmd(struct mmc_host *host, struct mmc_card *card)
>   {
>   	int err;
> @@ -115,10 +124,44 @@ int mmc_app_set_bus_width(struct mmc_card *card, int width)
>   	return mmc_wait_for_app_cmd(card->host, card, &cmd);
>   }
>   
> +static int sd_app_op_cond_cb(void *cb_data, bool *busy)
> +{
> +	struct sd_app_op_cond_busy_data *data = cb_data;
> +	struct mmc_host *host = data->host;
> +	struct mmc_command *cmd = data->cmd;
> +	u32 ocr = data->ocr;
> +	int err;
> +	*busy = false;
> +
> +	err = mmc_wait_for_app_cmd(host, NULL, cmd);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
> +
> +	/* If we're just probing, do a single pass. */
> +	if (ocr == 0)
> +		return 0;
> +
> +	/* Wait until reset completes. */
> +	if (mmc_host_is_spi(host)) {
> +		if (!(cmd->resp[0] & R1_SPI_IDLE))
> +			return 0;
> +	} else if (cmd->resp[0] & MMC_CARD_BUSY) {
> +		return 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	*busy = true;
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
>   int mmc_send_app_op_cond(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr, u32 *rocr)
>   {
>   	struct mmc_command cmd = {};
> -	int i, err = 0;
> +	struct sd_app_op_cond_busy_data cb_data = {
> +		.host = host,
> +		.ocr = ocr,
> +		.cmd = &cmd
> +	};
> +	int err;
>   
>   	cmd.opcode = SD_APP_OP_COND;
>   	if (mmc_host_is_spi(host))
> @@ -127,36 +170,16 @@ int mmc_send_app_op_cond(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr, u32 *rocr)
>   		cmd.arg = ocr;
>   	cmd.flags = MMC_RSP_SPI_R1 | MMC_RSP_R3 | MMC_CMD_BCR;
>   
> -	for (i = 100; i; i--) {
> -		err = mmc_wait_for_app_cmd(host, NULL, &cmd);
> -		if (err)
> -			break;
> -
> -		/* if we're just probing, do a single pass */
> -		if (ocr == 0)
> -			break;
> -
> -		/* otherwise wait until reset completes */
> -		if (mmc_host_is_spi(host)) {
> -			if (!(cmd.resp[0] & R1_SPI_IDLE))
> -				break;
> -		} else {
> -			if (cmd.resp[0] & MMC_CARD_BUSY)
> -				break;
> -		}
> -
> -		err = -ETIMEDOUT;
> -
> -		mmc_delay(10);
> -	}
> -
> -	if (!i)
> -		pr_err("%s: card never left busy state\n", mmc_hostname(host));
> +	err = __mmc_poll_for_busy(host, SD_APP_OP_COND_PERIOD_US,
> +				  SD_APP_OP_COND_TIMEOUT_MS, &sd_app_op_cond_cb,
> +				  &cb_data);
> +	if (err)
> +		return err;
>   
>   	if (rocr && !mmc_host_is_spi(host))
>   		*rocr = cmd.resp[0];
>   
> -	return err;
> +	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   static int __mmc_send_if_cond(struct mmc_host *host, u32 ocr, u8 pcie_bits,
The implementation looks solid and it works as expected in the scenarios 
I tested.
Acked-by: Felix Qin <xiaokeqinhealth@....com>