[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20240430160302.00005fe1@Huawei.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2024 16:03:02 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
To: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
CC: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>, Dave Hansen
<dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Alison Schofield <alison.schofield@...el.com>, <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-cxl@...r.kernel.org>, kernel test
robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/7] ACPI/NUMA: Squash
acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() into acpi_parse_memory_affinity()
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 11:21:57 +0200
Robert Richter <rrichter@....com> wrote:
> After removing architectural code the helper function
> acpi_numa_memory_affinity_init() is no longer needed. Squash it into
> acpi_parse_memory_affinity(). No functional changes intended.
>
> While at it, fixing checkpatch complaints in code moved.
>
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202403220943.96dde419-oliver.sang@intel.com
> Reviewed-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Robert Richter <rrichter@....com>
Looks good to me. Printing an SRAT entry we then throw away is a bit
odd but it always did that.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists