linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] regulator: dt-bindings: fixed-regulator: Add a preferred node name

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date: Wed, 01 May 2024 00:04:21 +0900
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, 
 Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, 
 Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, "Rob Herring (Arm)" <robh@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regulator: dt-bindings: fixed-regulator: Add a
 preferred node name

On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 16:51:46 -0500, Rob Herring (Arm) wrote:
> Define "regulator-[0-9]v[0-9]" as the preferred node name for fixed
> regulators. Other suffixes with names are also accepted. Combined,
> these make up about half of the existing names in use.
> 
> For now this only serves as documentation as the schema still allows
> anything to avoid lots of additional warnings for something low priority
> to fix. Once a "no deprecated" mode is added to the tools, warnings can
> be enabled selectively.
> 
> [...]

Applied to

   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/regulator.git for-next

Thanks!

[1/1] regulator: dt-bindings: fixed-regulator: Add a preferred node name
      commit: b6d4b3500d57370f5b3abf0701c9166b384db976

All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during
the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if
problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted.

You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing
and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems and
send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if needed.

If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they
should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing
patches will not be replaced.

Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying
to this mail.

Thanks,
Mark